DISPARAGEMENT DENOUNCED BY DAMNING DAMAGES DECISION—VALLEY TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC V MALAK, 2024 BCCA 370
Abstract
There are several measures businesses can take to address unfair and inaccurate online reviews; however, these are often time-consuming and expensive. One option is an action for defamation, which may be particularly appropriate where the party making the defamatory statements is a business competitor hoping to undermine the targeted business by posting unflattering comments about its business practices. Such was the case in the Ansan Traffic v Valley Traffic litigation, the subject of this comment. Ultimately, the plaintiffs were awarded a total of $1.5 million for general, aggravated, and punitive damages, including $300,000 to the Ansan group of companies. Although this latter $300,000 general damages award was reportedly “the largest sum ever made to a corporation in B.C. for defamation [with] previous awards rang[ing] from $25,000—$150,000,” it may have been too low to be an effective deterrent.
Keywords:
defamatory statements posted online, general damages, aggravated damages, mental distress, punitive damages, competitors, contract, disgorgementDownloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Canadian Bar Foundation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


