Pierringer Settlement Agreements
Proceeding with Eyes Wide Open
Pierringer Agreements are a form of proportionate share settlement agreements. Under Pierringer Agreements plaintiffs settle with some defendants and continue the litigation against the non-settling defendants. The agreement severs joint liability between settling and non-settling defendants. Non-settling defendants are only liable for their proportionate share of the plaintiffs’ loss. Under- or over-settlements may be inevitable. Under the current Canadian approach, plaintiffs bear the risk of under-settlement but the benefit of over-settlement accrues to non-settling defendants. This is unfair because non-settling defendants bear no risk for under-settlement. The potential under-compensation that is a detriment to plaintiffs justifies retaining excess settlements similar to the private insurance exception to the compensation principle. This avoids incentivizing non-settling defendants and furthers the public interest in promoting settlements.
Keywords:Contract Law, Tort Law, Insurance Law, Civil Litigation, Damages, Costs, Settlements, Pierringer Agreements, Mary Carter Agreements, Double Recovery, Compensation Principle, Fairness Principle
Copyright (c) 2021 The Canadian Bar Foundation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.