L’APPORT DU JUGE LEBEL À L’ÉVOLUTION SUBSTANTIVE ET PROCÉDURALE DU SECRET PROFESSIONNEL DE L’AVOCAT
AbstractConsidered to be a rule of evidence until the early 1980s, solicitor-client privilege is now a principle of fundamental justice and a fundamental civil and legal right. Solicitor-client privilege is almost absolute and cannot be set aside except in specific and unusual circumstances: when the communications as such are criminal or are for the purpose of obtaining a legal opinion to facilitate the perpetration of a crime, where public security is in jeopardy, or where professional secrecy must be set aside to demonstrate that an accused is innocent. The transition from a rule of evidence to a substantive rule occurred in 1982, in Descôteaux et al. v Mierzwinski. Starting in the early 2000s, the Supreme Court revisited the question several times. Justice LeBel, who became a member of the Supreme Court on January 7, 2000, made a significant contribution to this process. Amongst other things, he drafted the Court’s reasons in Maranda v Richer and Foster Wheeler Power Co v Société intermunicipale de gestion et d’élimination des déchets (SIGED) inc, and also participated in a number of other decisions on this topic.
Keywords:Supreme Court, Confidentiality, solicitor-client privilege, Louis LeBel, Justice LeBel, Seminar in tribute to the Hon. Louis LeBel, Supreme Court of Canada, Professional secrecy, Law firm search and seizure
Download data is not yet available.