THE LAW OF OUR TODAY THE SELECTION AND TENURE OF JUDGES AND OTHERS WHO ACT AS JUDGES

Similar Articles

• Michelle PsutkaandElizabeth Sheehy, STRIP-SEARCHING OF WOMEN IN CANADA: WRONGS AND RIGHTS , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 94 No. 2 (2016)
• Robert Leckey, FAMILY OUTSIDE THE BOOK ON THE FAMILY , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 88 No. 3 (2010)
• HUGH FLANDERKINANDANDREWJ PIRIE, JUDGES AS MEDIATORS: WHAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN CANADA? , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 82 No. 2 (2003)
• Rachel Birnbaum, Nicholas BalaandLorne Bertrand, THE RISE OF SELF-REPRESENTATION IN CANADA’S FAMILY COURTS: THE COMPLEX PICTURE REVEALED IN SURVEYS OF JUDGES, LAWYERS AND LITIGANTS , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 91 No. 1 (2013)
• RONALD J ALLEN, GERALD TG SENIUK, TWO PUZZLES OF JURIDICAL PROOF , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 76 No. 1 & 2 (1997)
• PETER MCCORMICK, THE JUDGES AND THE JOURNALS: CITATION OF PERIODICAL LITERATURE BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, 1985-2004 , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 83 No. 3 (2004)
• RUDY V BULLER, EXPLAINING JUDGES' OBSESSION WITH THE ONUS OF PROOF IN DISABILITY CASES , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 80 No. 3 (2001)
• MICHAEL J HERMAN, GERALD FHAYDEN JR, ISSUE ESTOPPEL: MUTUALITY OF PARTIES RECONSIDERED , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 64 No. 3 (1986)
• W FRIEDMANN, JUDGES, POLITICS AND THE LAW , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 29 No. 8 (1951)
• Paul Daly, THE LANGUAGE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW , The Canadian Bar Review: Vol. 94 No. 3 (2017)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.